翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ United States v. Jawad
・ United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation
・ United States v. John
・ United States v. John (1978)
・ United States v. John (2010)
・ United States v England (1950 FIFA World Cup)
・ United States v Silk
・ United States v. $124,700 in U.S. Currency
・ United States v. 11 1/4 Dozen Packages of Articles Labeled in Part Mrs. Moffat's Shoo-Fly Powders for Drunkenness
・ United States v. 12 200-ft. Reels of Film
・ United States v. 50 Acres of Land
・ United States v. Adams
・ United States v. Agrawal
・ United States v. Alcoa
・ United States v. Alvarez
United States v. Alvarez-Machain
・ United States v. American Library Ass'n
・ United States v. American Tobacco Co.
・ United States v. American Trucking Ass'ns
・ United States v. Ancheta
・ United States v. Andrus
・ United States v. Antelope
・ United States v. Apple Inc.
・ United States v. Approximately 64,695 Pounds of Shark Fins
・ United States v. Archer Daniels Midland Co.
・ United States v. Arnold
・ United States v. Article Consisting of 50,000 Cardboard Boxes More or Less, Each Containing One Pair of Clacker Balls
・ United States v. Arvizu
・ United States v. ASCAP
・ United States v. AT&T Co.


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

United States v. Alvarez-Machain : ウィキペディア英語版
United States v. Alvarez-Machain

''United States v. Alvarez-Machain'', , was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the fact of respondent's forcible abduction does not prohibit his trial in a United States court for violations of this country's criminal laws. It re-confirmed the Ker-Frisbie Doctrine established in ''Ker v. Illinois'' (1886) and ''Frisbie v. Collins'' (1952).
==Background==
Humberto Álvarez Machaín, a Mexican physician, was allegedly involved in the 1985 kidnapping, torture, and murder of DEA agent Enrique Camarena Salazar by "prolonging Agent Camarena's life so that others could further torture and interrogate him."
On April 2,〔Mark S. Zaid: (Military might versus sovereign right — the kidnapping of Dr. Humberto Alvarez-Machain and the resulting fallout ). ''Houston Journal of International Law'', spring 1997, cited at ''Findarticles.com'' and there retrieved April 3, 2011〕 1990, Álvarez was abducted from Mexico by Trent Tompkins of Claysville, PA, a private citizen hired by DEA agents, and brought to trial in the United States over the protest of Mexican officials. Legal action reached the United States Supreme Court (as above) focusing upon the effect of illegal extradition upon the trial court's jurisdiction. Invoking the "Ker-Frisbie Doctrine" the U.S. Supreme Court held that the trial court's jurisdiction was not affected by the manner in which the accused was brought before it. This created international alarm and concern as other nations feared that the decision would encourage further such abductions.
Despite vigorous protests from the Mexican government, Álvarez was tried in United States District Court in Los Angeles; the trial, in which his defense focused intensely on the legality of the arrest, resulted in an acquittal. The trial judge (whose earlier decision dismissing the indictment had been overruled by the Supreme Court) ruled at the close of the government's case in chief that the government had not presented a prima facie case, and therefore granted an acquittal without presenting the matter to the jury for verdict. The other suspect, Javier Vasquez Velasco, was arrested for his alleged involvement in the murder, convicted, and sentenced to three life sentences.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「United States v. Alvarez-Machain」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.